Although both authors seem to recognize what exactly Web 2.0 is and the importance of its emergence, the authors definitely have different styles in their writing. While Batson, an English professor, seems to look at Web 2.0 from a teacher in the classroom's stand point, Alexander takes a non bias and candid look at the new technology. Batson takes the side of the argument that favors Web 2.0 in the classroom and seems to reject all questions against it. He comments on how it will be easier for children to learn and stay focused, while the jobs of teachers will become easier as they become less of the center of attention. Alexander on the other hand looks at questions proposed by those opposed to Web 2.0 and insightfully answers them through analysis of this type of browsing, stating why it is effective or why it might be unproductive. Alexander does not center his analysis solely on Web 2.0 in the classroom as Batson does, making his argument somewhat more valid.
Friday, October 9, 2009
Different viewpoints of Web 2.0
It is clear that both authors understand how web 2.0 is revolutionizing the classroom in its use of interaction and through new technology. As stated by Bryan Alexander in agreement with Batson's viewpoint, Web 2.0 has revealed a diverse set of digital strategies with powerful implications for higher education. Both authors also seem to recognize the different and important elements of Web 2.0. Alexander comments on Web 2.0's use of tags and it's tools that that allow tags to be organized.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It is interesting that you noted that both authors agreed that Web 2.o was revolutionary, but that Batson viewed it more positively. I didn't notice that Batson was so biased in his view of the technology for the sake of argument until you pointed it out. It is definitely noteworthy that Alexander is unbiased in his presentation of the facts, as he shows both the positive and negative effects of the changes.
ReplyDelete